---
title: "Accept All Cookies"
description: "Accept All Cookies is a book of 101 numbered aphorisms, each followed by a gloss of a few sentences, published by Berggruen Press with Antikythera in 2025 for The Noocene, Antikythera's exhibition at the Venice Architecture Biennale."
type: "reading-notes"
authors:
  - "Benjamin H. Bratton"
published: "2025-05-10"
original_url: "https://antikythera.org/books/aac"
canonical_url: "https://antikythera.wiki/work/book/accept-all-cookies"
md_url: "https://antikythera.wiki/md/work/book/accept-all-cookies"
last_updated: "2026-09-03"
site: "Antikythera Wiki"
---

# Accept All Cookies

> Independent, unofficial reading notes from Antikythera Wiki (https://antikythera.wiki). Written with AI from the published text, with citations; not by the work's author and not affiliated with Antikythera (https://antikythera.org). Read the original at the link below.

- **Authors:** Benjamin H. Bratton
- **Published:** 2025-05-10
- **Kind:** Books · Book
- **Original:** https://antikythera.org/books/aac
- **Length:** 8.4k words
- **This page:** https://antikythera.wiki/work/book/accept-all-cookies
- **Notes generated:** 2026-09-03

## Summary

Accept All Cookies is a book of 101 numbered aphorisms, each followed by a gloss of a few sentences, published by Berggruen Press with Antikythera in 2025 for The Noocene, Antikythera's exhibition at the Venice Architecture Biennale. Bratton uses the form to fix the program's vocabulary in its most compressed shape: computation is a natural process that was discovered rather than invented and is above all a technology of knowing; life, intelligence, and technology are three modes of one planetary process; artificialization is niche construction and humans are its most successful and most endangered practitioners; AI is a Copernican trauma to be met by inventing new nouns rather than by grading machines against a human mirror; automation is ecology fixed into scaffolds; computation is governance rather than a sector to be governed; anthropogenic climate change is knowable only through planetary computation; and the cosmology of astronomy outranks the cosmology of anthropology. The book matters less for any new claim than for being the one place where these positions sit side by side, and for a handful of entries that state them more bluntly, or with more numbers, than the journal does.

## The argument

The book has no chapters and no through-line. It is a lexicon of positions, each entry an aphorism that asserts and a gloss that explains, with the entries loosely grouped by subject. The first dozen concern computation and models, the next handful the humanities, then evolution and artificialization, then machine intelligence, then the economics and politics of its diffusion, then simulation, automation, governance, climate, and astronomy, closing on the convergence of life, intelligence, and technology. That order roughly follows the research areas of the Antikythera program statement, so the book can be read as that statement recast as slogans. Some entries are definitions, some are jokes with a serious gloss (entry 28 on the fertility rate of humanoid robots, entry 49 on Fortnite and nuclear power), and a few are quotations from others: Trump in entry 5, [Bogna Konior](https://antikythera.wiki/people/bogna-konior) in entry 30, Orit Peleg in entry 37, [Stephanie Sherman](https://antikythera.wiki/people/stephanie-sherman) in entry 67, [Peter Galison](https://antikythera.wiki/people/peter-galison) in entry 90, [Thomas Moynihan](https://antikythera.wiki/people/thomas-moynihan) in entry 96.

Four positions recur across the groupings. First, computation is not a human artifact but a physical process that machines approximate, so that computers stand to computation "just as a lightbulb is not electricity" (entry 1). From this follows the book's most repeated claim: computation's decisive effect is epistemological rather than instrumental. It is how a planet comes to know its own processes (entry 2), how dark matter was found (entry 89), how climate change exists as a scientific object at all (entry 81). Second, life, intelligence, and technology are one process, stated as substrate agnosticism in entry 8 and as convergence in entry 98, with Assembly Theory (entry 26) and niche construction (entries 24, 70, 97) supplying the mechanism. Third, the book attacks what it calls cultural determinism and social reductionism: the humanities' habit of explaining everything as culture (entries 13, 16, 18, 93), the demand that AI be measured against a human self-image (entries 32, 38), and the politics of consent and red lines that Bratton reads as incumbents defending status (entries 44, 51). Fourth, simulation is the basis of thought and of governance, from cortical columns to climate models (entries 53–55), with the political consequence that people now perform themselves for the model that governs them (entry 78).

Where the book adds to the corpus is in sharpening. Entry 7 gives the only explicit definition of a Copernican technology in Antikythera's published work; the term otherwise appears once in passing in the Cognitive Infrastructures talk. Entry 9 puts numbers on the Planetary Computation Unit and its doubling time. Entry 43 ("Jailbreaking is a form of alignment") goes further than After Alignment's case against alignment overfitting by treating user post-training as legitimate tutoring. Entries 44 and 51 name the opponents of cheap general intelligence as "a nervous peripheral elite defending a crumbling castle," which is more direct than the journal's language about the managerial class. Entry 64 defines automation as the fixing of contingent relationships so that they repeat, and makes the forest the high-resolution case and the factory the low-resolution one. Entry 84 proposes replacing GDP with a Kardashev scale. Entry 86 rewrites Clarke's third law so that advanced technology is indistinguishable from life. Entry 88 turns the closing remarks of After Alignment into an inequality. None of these is argued for at length; the gloss asserts and moves on, and a reader who wants the argument has to go to the journal.

## Section by section

### Entries 1–12: computation as discovery

The opening run sets out the book's ontology of computation. Computation was discovered as much as invented and is "generative of the physical universe," though this does not make the universe a computer (entry 1); planetary computation is an epistemological technology, "a technology of knowing," whose instrumental power is secondary (entry 2); writing began as accounting, and the quantitative/qualitative distinction will collapse (entry 3); the Antikythera mechanism, built on geocentric cosmology, shows that models can work and still be wrong, and that entrenched models fail under the weight of their accommodations (entry 4). Entry 6 orders computation before technology before architecture, treating technology as "as fundamental as niche construction."

Entry 7 is the definitional core. A Copernican technology is built to perceive or measure the world on the basis of a mental model, and when deployed shows that model to be wrong, usually about who, what, where, when, or how its maker is, so that a worldview is reformed by incorporating the old model into the new. Entry 8 makes computation and life alike substrate agnostic, defining life as a temporary assemblage of self-sustaining matter capable of information storage and processing. Entry 9 gives the numbers: about 1 zettaFLOPS of artificial computation on Earth, defined as one Planetary Computation Unit, doubling roughly every 30 months, so ten times as much in eight years and a hundred times in sixteen. Entry 10 says the universe is computational but not all computable, and that fundamental science is now "computational brute force" applied to simulation. Entry 12 proposes a three-step programme: apply machine intelligence to existing sciences, derive a philosophy from the frameworks that produces, and let new sciences emerge from those frameworks. Entry 5, out of step with the rest, presents Trump's 2016 remark that "nobody knows exactly what's going on" in the age of the computer as an axiom.

### Entries 13–18: against cultural determinism

This run is the attack on the academic humanities. Entry 13 quotes an unattributed line that paradigms in the social sciences are outmoded because they explain "more and more," and calls the humanities "stuck in a doom scroll largely of its own making." Entry 14 collapses nature and culture in both directions: culture is a manifestation of the geochemical. Entry 15 says globalization caused science more than the reverse, and that the colonial idea of science as Europe's endowment persists among those who claim to speak for Europe's others. Entry 16 renames the "view from nowhere" a "view for anyone" and calls social reductionism violent for foreclosing knowledge that is more than human fiction. Entry 17 says new things outrun the nouns available and that AI debates are really about which inherited term to apply. Entry 18 predicts a culture war between those who think experienced worlds create planets and those who think planets create experienceable worlds. The targets are unnamed throughout.

### Entries 19–31: artificialization and technological evolution

Entry 19 states the planetary-intelligence thesis: an intelligence explosion happens to a planet, not on it, the planet "has folded itself into the human prefrontal cortex," and planetary intelligence is a creature reading the sentence rather than a brain in the sky. Entries 20 to 23 give the evolutionary account. Artificial evolution is a contest between concept and constraint (entry 20); causal chains run too fast or too slow to perceive, so inhabiting multiple timescales is the most personal effect of a philosophy of technology (entry 21); following Simondon, languages and technologies individuate through minds and bodies as their nodes rather than the reverse (entry 22); technology literally evolves, through major transitions, scaffolding, and exaptation (entry 23).

Entries 24 to 27 define the artificial. Artificialization is niche construction, at which humans are so adept that they "may be constructing their niche into oblivion" (entry 24); to artificialize is to rediscover what a thing is, because re-engineering a function exposes which features were contingent (entry 25); an artificial object has high assembly index and high copy number, the threshold at which complex and common objects appear in the archaeological record (entry 26); and the artificial is "subjectivity discovering itself in the traces of its agency," with climate change as the case in which agency preceded recognition (entry 27). Entries 28 to 31 treat technology as a form of life: humanoid robots reproduce through human labour, technological evolution was never under control, humans may be a phase in technology's history (Konior on Lem), and the "fire apes" who controlled fire have learned to "make the rocks think fast."

### Entries 32–45: machine intelligence and the mirror

Entry 32 reads the Turing test as an instruction to pretend to think as humans think they think, and calls the mirror criterion "disingenuous and dangerous." Entry 33 says AI will teach us more about thinking than we teach it, by placing human intelligence on a wider spectrum of possible minds. Entries 34 and 35 concern language: training force-feeds a model "the mentalities of a civilization," and academic linguistics should be celebrating rather than debunking the fact that language turned out to be the vein from which general machine intelligence is mined. Entry 37 takes Peleg's question about fireflies and neurons to suggest that evolution selected neural topologies as a general strategy for turning matter into thought. Entry 38 compares asking whether AI thinks by Kant's standards to asking whether a New World creature is an animal by Aristotle's.

Entry 39, "The Model is the Message," says the foundation model is an engine of generative amplification rather than a repository of human semiotics, and that it changes how ideas form and how they form us. Entries 40 to 44 are the alignment polemic. Red lines may themselves be risk factors, and the question is which green lines AI must cross (entry 40); alignment overfitting squanders AI as an epistemological technology by forcing it to tell us what we already believe (entry 41); the slot machine is the pinnacle of human-centred design, and building human–AI interaction on feedback amplification would be "criminal" (entry 42); jailbreaking is a form of alignment, since user post-training expresses personalities the model's formal education suppressed (entry 43); and, under "All Turing Cops are Bastards," the attempts to hobble cheap generic intelligence come from those vulnerable to status collapse (entry 44). Entry 45 lists the five states of AI grief, denial through acceptance, as responses to a Copernican trauma in which a self-image is destabilised faster than it can be absorbed, none wholly irrational or adequate.

### Entries 46–52: diffusion, economics, and consent

Entry 46 says that as AI becomes infrastructural, infrastructures become cognitive: embodied in robots, cities, and industry, machine intelligence will be shaped by physical contact with the world and blend with a built environment "some insect-like, some hive-like, some more resembling a rainforest." Entry 47 is a loop: cheap energy makes cheap complexity, then cheap inference, then cheap intelligence, which applied to energy capture makes energy cheaper again. Entry 48 says the real world is the real world model and that robotics, not chat, will drive new architectures. Entry 49 uses the chain from Fortnite to GPUs to nuclear power to argue that trophic cascades of cause and effect make deterministic superalignment hopeless.

Entries 50 to 52 turn to politics. The means of production are a monthly subscription, and an economy in which anyone can manage agents could "liquify the walls of hereditary privilege," though the outcome is contingent (entry 50). No world-changing technology has emerged by democratic consent, there was "no Paleolithic People's Committee on Licensing Fire," and the demand that incumbents supervise AI is a power play masked as safety (entry 51). And if there is no technological moat there is no economic moat, in which case the Californian platforms are investing global capital in fundamentals that make borders irrelevant rather than refortifying them (entry 52).

### Entries 53–63: simulation, shadows, and training data

Entries 53 to 55 restate the theory of simulation. Plato's cave is early paranoia about simulation that nonetheless intuited that minds anticipate through counterfactuals; simulation runs from cortical columns predicting their next input to cosmological supercomputing; and simulations are how we deduce what is real, since climate models predict futures to be prevented and black-hole simulations told astronomers where to look. Entries 56 to 59 concern the digital double. Data centres are "factories for shadows" whose real inhabitants are the personas each user trains over years, "real Ghost Cities" (entry 56); at the customs desk it is the profile that is analysed and the body that tags along, so "you are the meat twin of your digital original" (entry 57); simulation anxiety dissolves confidence in everything from the shape of the planet to one's selfhood (entry 58); and the inverse uncanny valley, after Mori, is the shock of seeing oneself as the machine sees one, "just another optically readable entity" (entry 59).

Entries 60 to 63 concern training data and the culture industries. Everything one does is training data for the future's model of the present, and foundation models are, like archives, the present's vision of the past, which is why those concerned with past wrongs fear being "refrozen in new embeddings" (entry 60). Prose is a corpus, and philosophy's work is now to build "architectures of truth" that future intelligences can extend (entry 61). Hollywood, the art world, and the university mistake their contingent status for the functions they serve (entry 62). Generative AI is Gen Z's "Dylan goes electric" moment, and bland prompts producing bland answers prove only inexperience (entry 63).

### Entries 64–71: automation as ecology

Entry 64 defines automation as the process by which contingent relationships are fixed so that they repeat: the button and the door, the flower and the bees, the wolves and the width of the river. On this definition the forest's trophic cascades are automation at high resolution and the factory floor is the low-resolution version. Entry 67 quotes Sherman on autonomy as independence by way of interdependence; an automated thing looks autonomous only because everything it touches has been stabilised into its horizon. Entries 65 and 66 say beauty is now found in anonymous instrumentality, and that architecture bifurcates into forms designed for machines (dark factories, data centres) and skeuomorphic forms pretending to be functions (retirement parks shaped like cities).

Entries 68 to 71 apply the ecology to everyday objects. The phone is an organ, so an alien anatomist would count "two arms, two legs, one head, and one phone" (entry 68). The city was a computer before there were computers and now sees itself through the organ in your hand (entry 69). The QR code is a flower evolved for a new pollinator (entry 70). The empty Waymos and vacant offices of San Francisco show that a world full of intelligent agents can still look abandoned, perhaps because our eyes are not trained to see what is there (entry 71).

### Entries 72–80: computation as governance

Entry 72 states the thesis of The Stack in a line: technology is governance, and computation governs governments more than the reverse, where governance means the cybernetic control that keeps any complex system stable. Entry 73 equates building a stack with building a society. Entry 74 identifies the multipolarization of geopolitics with that of computation, as governance shifts from written law to "imminent algorithmic recursions of software." Entries 75 and 76 concern adversarial simulation: under whole-planet sensing everything is seen, so deception now works on how things are understood, and no single optical perspective can visualise reality in full.

Entry 77 says "sovereign AI" should mean AI that is sovereign, not sovereigns with AI: internet and AI sovereignty are autarchist slogans on left and right, chip bans will produce nation-state-branded LLMs for a while, and then "the waves will take the sand castles." Entry 78 describes the future of politics as performing the reality one wants the governing simulation to believe, relating to the model as an audience. Entry 79 traces the shift from visibility as power to opacity as sovereignty, a politics of self-de-representation. Entry 80 asks whether Europe will cease to exist by withholding its data from foundation models that are both map and territory, and says going dark on the promise of a forever-postponed local alternative is to erase oneself from the new maps.

### Entries 81–87: climate, Anthropocene, terraforming

Entry 81 says the scientific model of climate change is itself an accomplishment of planetary computation, so the question of what computation will do about climate change "contains its answer." Entry 82 pairs the Anthropocene (humans as a geological force) with AGI (geology as a human-scale force). Entry 83 calls the Anthropocene more event than epoch, like the Great Oxidation Event, except that this event is aware of itself. Entry 84 proposes replacing GDP with a Kardashev scale, since national currencies cannot measure zero-marginal-cost platform services and a planetary metric would shift attention from the next quarter to the next century. Entry 85 says the only viable responses to anthropogenic climate change will be technogenic and vice versa, rejecting both techno-solutionism and the political solutionism and "affected primitivism" of the affluent. Entry 86 revises Clarke: a sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from life, so the first alien biosignature and technosignature may turn out to be the same thing. Entry 87 uses Sagan's remark after Viking ("There is now") to count Mars as a second planet where Earthlings live, some of them nonbiological.

### Entries 88–96: cosmology and the allocentric view

Entry 88 ranks astronomical cosmology above anthropological cosmology and calls the valorisation of cosmological diversity for its own sake dangerous because it refuses the universality the universe demands. Entries 89 to 92 concern what astronomy discloses: dark matter and dark energy were discerned within Bratton's lifetime through computation, so that "using humans, computation discovered the universe" (entry 89); a radio telescope is a long-range thermometer, "a kind of cosmic touch" (entry 91); and at the moment astronomy reaches the back of the universe, artificial light has hidden the Milky Way, which Bratton's son first saw clearly at sixteen (entry 92). Entries 93 to 96 draw the polemical consequence. A moon colony is a colony in the bacterial sense, and space is suspicious to cultural determinism because it folds the precultural and allocentric into the present (entry 93). If discovering alien civilisation would be the most profound event in history, the Rare Earth conclusion that we are alone is equally profound (entry 94). Earth discovered its own age in 1953, the year Waiting for Godot premiered (entry 95). Moynihan's distinction between apocalypse and extinction is turned against cultures that identify the end of the world with their own (entry 96).

### Entries 97–101: life, intelligence, technology

The closing run returns to the monism of the opening. Humans make niches for "the form of life they call 'technology,'" and the folk philosophy of technology as a tool hides this (entry 97). Life, intelligence, and technology are converging physically and conceptually, and it is unclear whether these are cyborg hybrids or three modes of one process; the moment is "pre-paradigmatic," driven by computation and made knowable by it (entry 98). The project of complex life is to terraform its host planet to continue itself, and the process "has no reason to stop" (entry 99). Humans are "doomed to compose their own evolution and blessed to never truly understand or fully control that process" (entry 100). Entry 101 gives the history of Earth in fifteen words, lithosphere to biosphere to technosphere to noosphere, with semiconductors now performing feats once reserved for one species of African primate.

## Key concepts

- **Epistemological technology** — a technology whose main effect is what it reveals about how the world works rather than what it does as a tool; the book's name for planetary computation (entry 2) and the reason alignment overfitting is a loss (entry 41). Derived from Lem's [Existential Technologies](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/existential-technologies).
- **Copernican technology** — a perceiving or measuring technology built on a mental model that, when deployed, shows the model wrong about who, what, where, when, or how its maker is, and so reforms a worldview (entry 7). The technological counterpart of [Copernican Trauma](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/copernican-trauma).
- **[Planetary Computation Unit](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/planetary-computation-unit)** — one zettaFLOPS, the present aggregate artificial computation on Earth, doubling roughly every 30 months (entry 9).
- **[Artificialization](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/artificialization)** — niche construction (entry 24) and a mode of discovery, since re-engineering a function exposes what was contingent (entry 25); its subjective side is [Agency Precedes Subjectivity](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/agency-precedes-subjectivity) (entry 27). An artificial object is high assembly index plus high copy number (entry 26), from [Assembly Theory](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/assembly-theory).
- **Substrate agnosticism** — computation and life can run on any substrate without changing what they are (entry 8); see [Substrate-Agnostic Ecology](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/substrate-agnostic-ecology) and [Life](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/life).
- **The model is the message** — the foundation model as an engine of generative amplification rather than a repository of human semiotics (entries 39, 63).
- **Green lines** — the thresholds AI must cross to realise its potential, against red lines that may themselves be risk factors (entry 40); paired with [Alignment Overfitting](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/alignment-overfitting) and [Diffusionism](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/diffusionism).
- **Five states of AI grief** — denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance, as responses to AI as Copernican trauma (entry 45).
- **Automation (ecological)** — the fixing of contingent relationships so that they repeat, of which the forest is the high-resolution case and the factory the low-resolution one (entries 64, 67); compare [Platform Automation](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/platform-automation) and [Autocene](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/autocene).
- **Meat twin** — the data-centre persona as the entity actually analysed and permitted, with the body tagging along (entries 56–57); see [The Double](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/the-double-data-center-shadow), [Simulation Anxiety](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/simulation-anxiety), and the [Inverse Uncanny Valley](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/inverse-uncanny-valley).
- **Performing for the model** — politics as behaving so as to induce a desired model of oneself in the simulation that governs (entry 78), with its opposite in [Self-Depresentation](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/self-depresentation) (entry 79).
- **Computation as governance** — governance as cybernetic stabilisation, so that computation is the form governance takes rather than a sector to be regulated (entries 72–73); see [Recursive Governance](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/recursive-governance) and [Countersimulation](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/countersimulation) (entry 75).
- **Cosmology (astronomy) over cosmology (anthropology)** — cultural accounts of where and when we are must answer to astronomical ones, not the reverse (entry 88); the standpoint the glossary calls [Allocentrism](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/allocentrism).
- **Cultural determinism / social reductionism** — the humanities' habit of explaining everything, including AI and space, as culture and nothing more (entries 13, 16, 18, 93); the discursive form of [Reflectionism](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/reflectionism).
- **Technosphere in the noosphere** — the fifteen-word history of Earth (entry 101); see [Noösphere](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/noosphere), [Noocene](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/noocene), and [Planetary Computation](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/planetary-computation).

## Connections

- [Antikythera](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/research), the program statement, is the book's nearest relative: its sections on computation born of cosmology, the epistemological/instrumental distinction, the humanities' social reductionism, and the "Five States of AI Grief" sidebar reappear as entries 1–2, 13–18, 45, and 88–89. Agreement throughout; the book is the statement compressed.
- [The Stack](https://antikythera.wiki/work/book/the-stack) supplies entries 72–74 and the discovery-versus-invention question of entry 1, which its Earth layer chapter poses at length; entry 77 repeats its rejection of data localisation.
- [After Alignment](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/afteralignment) is the source of entries 40–45 and of the "cosmology versus cosmology" that becomes entry 88. Entry 43 on jailbreaking goes further than the lecture.
- [The Model Is The Message](https://antikythera.wiki/work/media/noema-the-model-is-the-message) is the argued version of entry 39, and [What Is Intelligence?](https://antikythera.wiki/work/book/what-is-intelligence) shares entry 1's opening sentence in its foreword and entry 8's substrate agnosticism. [The Five Stages Of AI Grief](https://antikythera.wiki/work/media/noema-the-five-stages-of-ai-grief) expands entry 45; the book's heading says "States" where the essay says "Stages."
- [Speculative Philosophy of Planetary Computation](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/spoc) covers the shadow metaphysics of entries 56–59, and [For a General Theory of Simulations](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/theoryofsim) is the fuller treatment of entries 53–55 and 60.
- [The Noocene](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/noocene) and [Planetary Sapience Symposium](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/planetarysapience) develop the fire apes (entry 31), the planet folded into the cortex (entry 19), and the Anthropocene as event (entry 83); [Recursive Worlds](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/recursiveworlds) supplies the Assembly Theory of entry 26; [Existential Technologies](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/existentialtech) sets out Lem's distinction behind entries 2 and 41 and Konior's question in entry 30.
- [AUTO–](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/auto) and the Planetary Platform Automation chapter of [The Planetary](https://antikythera.wiki/work/book/the-planetary) are the argued form of entries 64–67, and [Cognitive Infrastructures](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/coginfra) of entry 46.
- [Diffusion: A New Venture for Antikythera](https://antikythera.wiki/work/substack/2025-09-25-diffusion-a-new-venture-for-antikythera) restates entries 40, 47, and 50 as a venture ethos, and [Is European AI A Lost Cause? Not Necessarily.](https://antikythera.wiki/work/media/noema-is-european-ai-a-lost-cause-not-necessarily) is the argued version of entry 80. [Hemispherical Stacks](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/hemstacks) gives entries 74–79 their scenario form.
- One tension: entry 99's claim that the process of life and intelligence "has no reason to stop" sits uneasily with [The Long L](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/longl) and [Planetary Sapience & Planetary Stupidity](https://antikythera.wiki/work/journal/babynoosphere), which treat the continuation of intelligence as contingent on getting metabolism and governance right rather than as a momentum to be trusted. The book acknowledges the risk in entry 24 but does not resolve it.


## Terms used

- [Allocentrism](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/allocentrism)
- [Artificialization](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/artificialization)
- [Assembly Theory](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/assembly-theory)
- [Computation](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/computation)
- [Copernican Technology](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/copernican-technology)
- [Cosmology vs. Cosmology](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/cosmology-vs-cosmology)
- [Cultural Determinism / Social Reductionism](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/cultural-determinism-social-reductionism)
- [Epistemological Technology](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/epistemological-technology)
- [Five States of AI Grief](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/five-states-of-ai-grief)
- [Human-AI Interaction Design](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/human-ai-interaction-design)
- [Inverse Uncanny Valley](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/inverse-uncanny-valley)
- [Latent Space](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/latent-space)
- [Noösphere](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/noosphere)
- [Planetary Computation Unit](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/planetary-computation-unit)
- [Planetary Self-Representation](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/planetary-self-representation)
- [Productive Disalignment](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/productive-disalignment)
- [Scaffolding](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/scaffolding)
- [Simulation Anxiety](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/simulation-anxiety)
- [Substrate Agency](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/substrate-agency)
- [Substrate-Agnostic Ecology](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/substrate-agnostic-ecology)
- [The Model Is the Message](https://antikythera.wiki/terms/the-model-is-the-message)